Comparing the effect of two different intraocular lenses on optical aberrations in bilaterally operated eyes for cataract | Ayhan Tuzcu | Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Old Website
 

Comparing the effect of two different intraocular lenses on optical aberrations in bilaterally operated eyes for cataract

Esra Ayhan Tuzcu, Kuddusi Erkılıc, Betul Bulut, Nilufer Ilhan

Abstract


Objective: To assess high order and spherical aberrations results of hydrophobic acrylic AMO Sensar AR40E and hydrophobic acrylic Alcon AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses after implantation in cases with bilateral cataract.

Methods: Cases diagnosed as bilateral cataract were included in the study and preoperative aberration measurements were recorded by using Nidek OPD SCAN-ARK 1000. Groups were created by implanting AMO Sensar AR40E to one eye of the patients, while Alcon AcrySof SA60AT into the other in a prospective and randomized manner. Aberration measurements were recorded after one and two months of surgery.

Results: Overall, 40 eyes in 20 patients (11 women and 9 men) were included in the study. All patients underwent bilateral phacoemulsification surgery due to cataract. There were 20 eyes in both groups. Mean age was 62.4 (range: 31-82) years. There was no significant difference in aberrations recorded before surgery and one and two months after surgery in both groups. (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: There was no difference among spherical intraocular lenses used in this study.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.294.3607

How to cite this:Tuzcu EA, Erkilic K, Bulut B, Ilhan N. Comparing the effect of two different intraocular lenses on optical aberrations in bilaterally operated eyes for cataract. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29(4):982-985.   doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.294.3607

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


kalsob-01_1303_01